For this article, I read through Dr. Eric T. Payne's letter to CPSA council members, in which he rationally protests against imposed vaccine mandates. The following is taken from his letter, with a few omissions and paraphrases to make it more layman-friendly.
If you want to verify the information for yourself, use the original letter's sources and contact the doctor via email if you have any questions.
Do NOT rely on Google or mainstream search engines, they are demonstrably corrupt (as outlined here), as they will only direct you to pro-vaccine propaganda results.
The notion is a misnomer; the same people who gladly take the yearly flu shot are against a newly-introduced vaccine which totes experimental mRNA therapy. These current mRNA vaccines from Moderna, Pfizer and the like are essentially a completely novel and experimental therapy with no long-term data. Note that the CDC has changed the definitions of immunity and vaccine so that instead of producing immunity, now vaccines provide protection.
The vaccine mandates being put in place are a form of coersion, violating the internationally-accepted Nuremberg code, developed in 1947 to protect patients from medical experimentation, with the first declaration: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential."
It is because of being informed, that people do not voluntarily consent to these injections. Trampling on the individual's legal and moral rights in the name of perceived communal benefits is not justified by the current medical science, and in fact, will cause harms both predictable and unpredictable.
Medical evidence has shown that the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccines has decreased significantly; they do not prevent COVID-transmission or symptomatic disease, and while evidence for protection against serious illness continues to exist – that too is fading away globally. Not only that, but it is the vaccinated who are driving the mutations, not the unvaccinated. With the Delta variant, there's clinical data that widespread use of a "leaky" vaccine during the pandemic leads to – where antibodies recognize and bind to a pathogen, but act as a "trojan horse," allowing the pathogen to get into cells and worsen the immune response.
The initial clinical trial for the Pfizer vaccine suggested 95% protection against COVID-19, while the Moderna vaccine showed 94.1% efficacy for preventing COVID-19 illness. But as the virus continues to mutate, the derived from the mRNA vaccines has diminished substantially.
The mRNA vaccines contain the genetic code for our bodies to produce the original COVID-19 protein/antigen from ONLY Wuhan. As the virus protein mutates away from the initial Wuhan strain, the antibodies are having more difficulty recognizing the 's' protein of subsequent COVID strains. While these antibodies show some cross-reactivity to other variants, the vaccine's decreased effectiveness partly reflects mutations to the 's' protein – becoming "leaky" in the ability to combat subsequent variants.
To date, smallpox is the only human virus successfully eradicated through vaccination, and it was less transmissible and lacked an animal reservoir. Even if all people were vaccinated with a 100% effective vaccine, COVID would continue to survive among animal reservoirs (like bats).
Those who have received a COVID vaccine have presumably generated antibodies to detect the 's' protein of COVID-19, in contrast to those who have been infected with COVID who now have antibodies to the 's' protein and other parts of the virus, including the nucleocapsid.
If the virus wants to replicate in these people, it needs to mutate to evade destruction. Those who didn't receive the vaccine or were previously infected, they lack these antibodies, so with them, the virus doesn't need to mutate to enter host cells and replicate.
The argument that those without the vaccine are driving mutations then depends on the notion that if everyone achieves herd immunity or eradicates the virus more quickly, we would limit its ability to mutate, which all coronaviruses naturally do. This argument falls apart when you see that COVID still exists in spite of vaccination attempts – including the inability to vaccinate enough people and animal reservoirs globally to achieve herd immunity.
With widespread use of COVID vaccines during the pandemic, we are placing on the virus to continue mutating to evade the immune system, gain cell entry, replicate and possibly cause illness. The "leaky" vaccines make viral evasion from antibodies much more easier, with the principle that only the fit will survive (as in antibiotic resistance and superbugs).
The CDC director confirmed that "Delta infection resulted in similarly high SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in vaccinated and unvaccinated people. High viral loads suggest an increased risk of transmission and raised concern that, unlike with other variants, vaccinated people infected with Delta can transmit the virus."
Later on, Dr. Walensky would state on CNN (August 6, 2021):
"Our vaccines are working exceptionally well. They continue to work well for Delta, with regard to severe illness or death – they prevent it. But what they can't do anymore is prevent transmission."On August 19, the CDC advocated for COVID booster shots, citing evidence that despite full mRNA vaccination, patients were experiencing "reduced protection against mild and moderate disease."
But more damning is this: on July 23, 2021, Israel's Health Ministry indicated that a complete course of the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA vaccine was just 39% effective at preventing infections and 41% effective at preventing symptomatic illness with the Delta variant, but remained 91% effective at preventing serious illness and hospitalization.
However, by August 16, and despite having 78% of those aged 12 and older fully vaccinated, 59% of gravely ill patients in Israel were fully vaccinated.
Intuitively, you would imagine that our immune system would generate a more complete, robust and prolonged immune response to COVID, rather than the mRNA vaccines. Indeed, after about six months of progressively decreasing mRNA vaccine effectiveness, you have some governments mandating boosters with seemingly no end in sight.
A recent Nature paper showed that 17 years after the 2003 SARS outbreak, long-lasting memory T-cells were still present to the nucleocapsid ('n' protein) in those infected with SARS-CoV, and these T-cells displayed a robust cross-reactivity to the 'n' protein of COVID-19. Moreso, since the onset of the pandemic, extremely low reinfection rates have been observed. For instance, "with a total of 835,792 Israelis known to have recovered from the virus, the 72 instances of reinfection amount to 0.0086% of people who were already infected with COVID.
Yet, we are using coercion to force people to take mRNA vaccines even if they've already had a previous COVID-19 infection, no matter the lab confirmation of sustained immunity.
No crystal ball exists to predict long-term risks of novel treatments. Remember when mRNA vaccines were not associated with in male adolescents?
Should experimental mRNA vaccines be mandated despite the lack of long-term data? Perhaps there are certain vulnerable adult and pediatric groups who will prove to endure a higher risk over time from the shots, rather than the virus itself? Consider that a young and healthy woman who is coercied by health services to take the experimental shot, and over the next few years, it becomes clear that these "vaccines" are associated with fertility issues in some women. Sound crazy?
Vaccine companies and medical officials repeatedly claim that when we are injected with these mRNA vaccines, the lipid nanoparticles which contain the 's' protein mRNA needed for our cells to produce the 's' protein stay at the injection site. But this appears false.
In reality, the 's' antigen, far from dissipating from the site of injection, continutes to circulate through blood plasma, weeks later after vaccination. Does this contribute to COVID (VITT) and other instances of adverse thrombotic events? It must be asked if these 's' proteins can circulate through our cerebral spinal fluid, given that the ACE2 receptors are also present in the brain, and could grant the 's' proteins access. Crazy?
In a murine model, the virus "SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier, accompanied with basement membrane disruption..," ensued by "inflammatory responses including vasculitis, glial activation, and upregulated inflammatory factors." Further, when injected intravenously (by IV drip), the S1 protein of COVID was found to cross the blood-brain barrier in mice, with following inflammation. The S1 protein entered all brain regions, including
Canadian immunologist and vaccine researcher Dr. Byram Bridle (Guelph University) was awarded a large government grant for research on COVID-19 vaccine development. Only through a Freedom of Information act, did he and other scientists subsequently gain access to Pfizer's rat biodistribution study from the Japanese regulatory agency.
It clearly showed that when injected in the muscle, the concentration was highest at the dosing site, then the liver, and then detected in the spleen, adrenal glands and ovaries.
Upon receiving the Pfizer rat studies, Dr. Bridle wanted to warn people after being petrified and shocked by this data. There is no denying that the mRNA vaccine injection distributes throughout our body based on the existing data – unfortunately, Dr. Bridle was attacked by the medical community in a smear campaign, especially for his comments that the 's' protein itself is toxic and can cause harm.
COVID-19 infection ultimately disturbs several pathways associated with neurodegeneration, including but not limited to and , and if some of the 's' antigen our bodies produce in response to the mRNA vaccine is indeed entering our cerebral spinal fluid and brains, it is only rational to heed these warnings about the possibility of induced early neurodegenerative diseases.
Data from the American Academy of Pediatrics Children and COVID-19: State Data Report, found that 0.1-1.9% of their child COVID-19 cases resulted in hospitalizations, and 0.00-0.03% of all child COVID-19 cases resulted in death.
In the province of Alberta (in Canada), the average age of death in COVID cases is 80 years, with a range from 20 to 107 years. No pediatric patients have thus far died in Alberta, and contrary to media portrayal, children with COVID are also very rarely susceptible to multisystem inflammatory syndrome and neurological sequelae.
The American Academy of Pediatrics also confirmed that while Delta is infecting more children, it is not causing increased disease severity, and while many studies suggest pre-symptomatic/asymptomatic spread may comprise over 40% of vertical transmission, numerous large observational studies show that children are poor COVID-19 spreaders – including studies from Ireland, Iceland, Italy, France and Australia.
Despite clear decreased mRNA vaccine effectiveness, Dr. Fauci and President Biden have expressed their desire to start giving the mRNA shots to children aged 6 months to 11 years, and indeed, trials with Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna are underway. Dr. Fauci said on August 31, 2021:
"I believe that mandating vaccines for children to appear in school is a good idea."Further, President Biden said on July 21 that children under age 12 could be eligible for a COVID vaccine within the next few months.
There are animal model studies of prior SARS-CoV viruses that raise safety concerns. Decades ago, kittens were immunized with a viral recombinant encoding the spike protein of the coronavirus, producing low titres of neutralizing antibodies. After being challenged with the feline virus, these animals succumbed earlier than the control group in "early death syndrome."
More recently, (a type of monkey) who were immunized with a modified viral vector expressing the SARS-CoV protein had suffered more severe lung injury compared with unvaccinated animals. Similarly, immunized macaques with four B-cell peptide epiopes of the 's' protein found that while three peptides elicited antibodies that protected the macaques from viral challenge, one of the peptides induced antibodies that enhanced infection in vitro, and resulted in more severe lung pathology in vivo.
A recent study of healthcare workers in Vietnam assessing the transmission of COVID (Delta) found that the previous mRNA double-vaccinated group had 251 times higher nasopharyngeal viral loads compared to those unvaccinated, and there was NO correlation between vaccine-induced neutralizing antibody levels and viral loads, or the development of symptoms.
Very recently, researchers found "facilitating" antibodies bound to the NTD region of the Delta spike variant (located behind the contact surface so that it does not interfere with the virus-cell attachment).
"Inasmuch as neutralizing antibodies overwhelm facilitating antibodies, ADE is not a concern. However, the emergency of SARS-CoV-2 variants may tip the scales in favour of infection enhancement. Our structural and modelling data suggest that it might be the case for Delta variants."
If antibody-dependent enhancement is not a factor, there would be studies that will happily prove the silenced experts wrong. If it is, doubling down on widespread leaky mRNA vaccines and boosters is NOT viable and needs a course change.
Remember when COVID-19 escaping from a lab in Wuhan, as opposed to jumping from bats to humans, was a "demonstrably false" conspiracy theory? The Washington Post, among others, was even forced to retract prior statements claiming this was "debunked." Based on the virus' genetic code, , a virologist who shared the 2008 Nobel Prize for the discovery of HIV was among the first to state publicly and with extreme certainty that this virus was manipulated in a lab.
In March 2020, it was Andersen and colleagues' paper appearing in Nature Medicine where they concluded that:
"In the midst of the global COVID-19 public-health emergency, it is reasonable to wonder why the origins of the pandemic matter. Although the evidence shows that SARS CoV-2 is not a purposefully manipulated virus, it is currently impossible to prove or disprove the other theories of its origin described here."
For those with basic science background, a more complex COVID-19 genetics analysis is offered by the Chinese whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan's original scientific papers:
Tyler Durden of the ZeroHedge news site outlines the Fauci emails and ties to the Wuhan institute of Virology, with embedded links to original documents and his emails.
There are several researchers and experts, including Professor Montagnier, who stated that the COVID-19 vaccine is creating variants and not the unvaccinated. He also warned about the risks of trying to vaccinate everyone during a pandemic, as you risk causing secondary harm by perpetuating
As described, there is emerging evidence of antibody-dependent enhancement and the COVID-Delta variant. But regardless of whether Prof. Montagnier is correct, the censorship over his viewpoint is ludicrous. Science is driven by debate - especially during times of uncertainty - not censorship.
Not only were his videos removed, but worse: a lie was made over the internet, and perpetuated in the media, saying that he claimed everyone who took the mRNA vaccines would be dead in two years. It's the prominent narrative you'll find in most internet search engines, yet he never said this.
Think about it: big tech and social media are still removing any video link to Prof. Montagnier's comments without evidence to dispute his claims, while allowing the character assassination lie about him on their platforms. To censor facts and reasonable expert opinion to prevent vaccine hesitancy is not only unscientific, but it is coercive and Orwellian nonsense that you'd frankly expect from a 1984-style dystopia.
If you search in Google for Dr. Robert Malone, who holds multiple patents for mRNA vaccine technology, you will find that his provable accomplishments are discredited. Now you'll mainly hear about him as an and a zealot just out for media attention.
Far from being an "antivaxxer" zealot, if you listen to Dr. Malone speak, he is genuinely insightful about mRNA technology, scientifically balanced, and who shares genuine concern with the imposed vaccine mandates.
He has taken the mRNA vaccines himself, but cautions about their widespread use during a pandemic, especially among low-risk groups.
If you're in doubt about the fractured state of the modern world over the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccines, please judge the data and interviews for yourself first, and open your mind to the possibility that the blatant medical censorship is negatively impacting everyone's quality of life, along with our policymakers' ability to make informed decisions. You are living in a time when original articles in Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine regarding COVID-19 treatment are being retracted because they were completely fabricated.
With the World Health Organization and CDC, financial and political interests have crippled their independence, and during the COVID pandemic, they have egregiously misrepresented facts and helped censor scientific experts worldwide. During the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic, it was proven in court that the WHO did not act ethically when it came to their global vaccine agreements. These organizations that inform health policy in Canada and around the world are utterly compromised by vaccine and big pharma interest money.
Worse, we can no longer rely on the mainstream media cabal to be independent and forthcoming; you have CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky's declaration (July 16, 2021) that we are facing a "pandemic of the unvaccinated," a comment which perpetuated societal hatred and division, and is now contradicted by the global epidemiology that you have just read.
Despite the enormous social backlash, the ongoing confusion and hatred received by others including family members and friends, despite being faced with ongoing and constantly increasing punitive restrictions including the inability to travel, visit family, enjoy a meal at a restaurant, or even earn a living – there are 20-40% vaccine-eligible people who outright REFUSE the jab, including many healthcare workers worldwide who strongly reject this wave of